From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galloway v. Wenerowicz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 17, 2016
Civil Action No. 13-956 (W.D. Pa. May. 17, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-956

05-17-2016

DENARD GALLOWAY, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, et al., Respondents.



Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

On April 20, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 17) recommending that Denard Galloway's Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed, and that a certificate of appealability be denied. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on the parties, and no objections have been filed.

After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, it hereby is ORDERED that: Denard Galloway's Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED; a certificate of appealability is denied; and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. May 17, 2016

s\Cathy Bissoon

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): Denard Galloway
EN-2702
S.C.I. Graterford
P.O. Box 244
Graterford, PA 19426 cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Galloway v. Wenerowicz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 17, 2016
Civil Action No. 13-956 (W.D. Pa. May. 17, 2016)
Case details for

Galloway v. Wenerowicz

Case Details

Full title:DENARD GALLOWAY, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 17, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-956 (W.D. Pa. May. 17, 2016)

Citing Cases

Melo v. Giroux

(finding that petitioner failed to establish cause under Martinez when his PCRA counsel ineffectiveness claim…