From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galloway v. Trimble

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 23, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1464 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1464 KJM DAD P

08-23-2011

PETER LYNN GALLOWAY, Petitioner, v. R.H. TRIMBLE, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 15) is denied.

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Galloway v. Trimble

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 23, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1464 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Galloway v. Trimble

Case Details

Full title:PETER LYNN GALLOWAY, Petitioner, v. R.H. TRIMBLE, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 23, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1464 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)