From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gallon v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Apr 3, 2024
8:23-cv-2476-MSS-AEP (M.D. Fla. Apr. 3, 2024)

Opinion

8:23-cv-2476-MSS-AEP

04-03-2024

STORMI JADE GALLON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER

MARY S. SORIVEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Remand to the Commissioner of Social Security. (Dkt. 16) On April 2, 2024, United States Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli issued a Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 17), which recommended Defendant's Motion be granted. Upon consideration of all relevant filings, case law, and being otherwise fully advised, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Remand to the Commissioner of Social Security.

In the Eleventh Circuit, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation after conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district judge “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). This requires that the district judge “give fresh consideration to those issues to which specific objection has been made by a party.” Jeffrey S. v. State Bd. of Educ., 896 F.2d 507, 512 (11th Cir.1990) (quoting H.R. 1609, 94th Cong. § 2 (1976)). Absent specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation, in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the opinion the Report and Recommendation should be adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 17), is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this Order.

2. Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Remand to the Commissioner of Social Security, (Dkt. 16), is GRANTED.

3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Plaintiff and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the reasons stated in the Commissioner's Motion.

4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case and terminate any pending motions.

DONE and ORDERED


Summaries of

Gallon v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Apr 3, 2024
8:23-cv-2476-MSS-AEP (M.D. Fla. Apr. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Gallon v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:STORMI JADE GALLON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Apr 3, 2024

Citations

8:23-cv-2476-MSS-AEP (M.D. Fla. Apr. 3, 2024)