Opinion
2:22-cv-00023-APG-NJK
11-14-2022
MARC GALLI, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY RUSH, individually and in his official capacity; EDWARD PICKUP, individually and in his official capacity; HENDERSON FIRE DEPARTMENT, a municipal entity; MARISSA MEYERS, individually and in her official capacity; and JOSHUA FILSINGER, individually and in his official capacity; HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, a municipal entity; CITY OF HENDERSON, a municipal entity; and DOE DEFENDANTS I - X, Defendants.
CITY OF HENDERSON BRIAN R. REEVE Assistant City Attorney Nevada Bar No. 10197 Attorneys for Defendants City of Henderson et al THE LAW OFFICES OF KRISTINA WILDEVELD LISA A. RASMUSSEN Nevada Bar No. 7491 Attorneys for Plaintiff Marc Galli
CITY OF HENDERSON BRIAN R. REEVE Assistant City Attorney Nevada Bar No. 10197 Attorneys for Defendants City of Henderson et al
THE LAW OFFICES OF KRISTINA WILDEVELD LISA A. RASMUSSEN Nevada Bar No. 7491 Attorneys for Plaintiff Marc Galli
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR HENDERSON DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants Anthony Rush, Edward Pickup, Henderson Fire Department, Marissa Myers, Joshua Filsinger, Henderson Police Department, and City of Henderson (collectively “Henderson Defendants”), through their attorney of record, Brian R. Reeve, Assistant City Attorney, and Plaintiff Marc Galli (“Galli”), by and through his attorney of record, Lisa A. Rasmussen, Esq., of the Law Office of Kristina Wildevelde and Associates, hereby stipulate and agree pursuant to LR IA 6-1 and LR IA 6-2 to extend the time for the Henderson Defendants to file their Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment by fourteen (14) days to November 29, 2022. This is the Henderson Defendants' first request for such an extension of time.
The Henderson Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment on September 21, 2022. (ECF 23). On October 12, 2022, the parties filed a Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF 25). The Stipulation requested a 21-day extension of time, making Plaintiff's response due on November 2, 2022. The Court approved the Stipulation on October 13, 2022. (ECF 26). On November 1, 2022, Plaintiff filed his Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF 27). Under LR 7-2(b), the Henderson Defendants' Reply in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment would be due on November 15, 2022. However, due to the Henderson Defendants' counsel being out of the office and having to attend to matters involving other preexisting deadlines upon his return, the parties agree that good cause exists for a 14-day extension of time for the Henderson Defendants to file their Reply brief in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment.
Based on the foregoing, the parties HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that the time for the Henderson Defendants to file their Reply in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment shall be extended by fourteen (14) days, from November 15, 2022, to November 29, 2022.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE
IT IS SO ORDERED.