From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gallegos v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02861-AP (D. Colo. Feb. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02861-AP

02-07-2012

CELIA GALLEGOS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

For Plaintiff : Derek W. Freeman, Esq. Diane K. Bross, PC For Defendant : Jessica Milano Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

Derek W. Freeman, Esq.

Diane K. Bross, PC

For Defendant:

Jessica Milano

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Assistant Regional Counsel

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

This is an appeal of a Social Security benefits application. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: November 3, 2011

B. Date Complaint was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: November 17, 2011

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: January 17, 2012

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises any unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Counsel for both parties conferred and agreed upon the following proposed briefing schedule:

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief: March 19, 2012

B. Response Brief due: April 18, 2012

C. Reply Brief due: May 3, 2012

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

Jessica Milano for

Derek W. Freeman, Esq.

Diane K. Bross, PC

Attorney for Plaintiff

(SIGNED PER ELECTRONIC

AUTHORIZATION)

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

WILLIAM G. PHARO

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

__________________

Jessica Milano

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant


Summaries of

Gallegos v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02861-AP (D. Colo. Feb. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Gallegos v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CELIA GALLEGOS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 7, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02861-AP (D. Colo. Feb. 7, 2012)