Opinion
Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-2175-G.
February 15, 2005
ORDER
After reviewing de novo the findings, conclusions, and recommendation ("Findings") of the United States Magistrate Judge, I am of the opinion that the Findings of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings of the court, except for the following: (1) on page 3, lines 1-2, the citations should read "Fernandez v. I.N.S., 3:01-CV-0317-P, 2001 WL 435065, at *1-2 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2001);" (2) on page 3, lines 6-7, the case name should be changed to "Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose Milpitas Judicial District, Santa Clara County, California;" (3) on page 4, line 3, the period after "(Division C)"should be deleted and a comma should be inserted between "(Division C)" and " 110 Stat. 3009-546;" (4) on page 4, line 16, the citation should read "Id. ( quoting Neuman, 113 HARV. L.REV. at 1991);" (5) on page 5, line 7, the citation should read "Sol v. I.N.S., 274 F.3d 648, 651 (2d Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 941 (2002);" (6) on page 6, lines 14-15, the citation should read "See Yi v. Ridge, No. 3:03-CV-2878-M, 2004 WL 1732463, at *4 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2004);" and (7) on page 6, line 21, the word "tailed" should be changed to "tailored."
It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, except as modified herein, are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the court.