Galland v. State

Full title: ANTHONY ANDREW GALLAND, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 3, 2011

SA CV 10-1208-SJO (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2011)

Opinion

ANTHONY ANDREW GALLAND, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. No. SA CV 10-1208-SJO (PJW) United States District Court, C.D. California. March 3, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

          S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.

         Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, Rule 11(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).