From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gallagher v. TDS Telecom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 2001
280 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

February 7, 2001.

Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Grow, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, HAYES, BURNS AND LAWTON, JJ.


Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following

Memorandum:

Defendant failed to support its motion with a copy of the pleadings filed in the action and thus Supreme Court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint ( see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Logan v. L.A. Mgt. Rest., 275 A.D.2d 1026; McMahon v. Wolverine Worldwide, 233 A.D.2d 587; Dupuy v. Carrier Corp., 204 A.D.2d 977). The court, however, properly denied the cross motion for summary judgment because plaintiff also failed to submit a copy of the pleadings in support of his cross-motion ( see, Deer Park Assocs. v. Robbins Store, 243 A.D.2d 443). Therefore, we modify the order and judgment by denying defendant's motion and reinstating the complaint.


Summaries of

Gallagher v. TDS Telecom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 2001
280 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Gallagher v. TDS Telecom

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD R. GALLAGHER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TDS TELECOM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 7, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 422

Citing Cases

Niles v. County of Chautauqua

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following…

Merchants Ins. Grp. v. Hi-Tech Irrigation, Inc.

Third-party defendant Searles Architects moves (# 008) for summary judgment dismissing the third-party…