Opinion
15532-22
03-10-2023
JOHN C. GALLAGHER, DECEASED, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge
On September 7, 2022, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, on the ground that the petition was not executed or filed by a fiduciary or personal representative duly appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction and legally entitled to institute a case on behalf of John C. Gallagher, Deceased. The petition in this case was signed by James J. Gallagher, decedent's son.
It is well settled that unless the petition is filed by the taxpayer, or by someone lawfully authorized to act on his behalf, we are without jurisdiction. See Fehrs v. Commissioner. 65 T.C. 346, 348-349 (1975); Rule 60(a), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. In pertinent part, Rule 60(c) provides that "The capacity of a fiduciary or other representative to litigate in the Court shall be determined in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction from which such person's authority is derived."
Upon due consideration, it is
ORDERED that, on or before April 3, 2023, James J. Gallagher or other appropriate representative shall file an objection, if any, to respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Any such objection should advise the Court whether Mr. Gallagher or any person has been duly appointed the executor, personal representative, or fiduciary for the Estate of John C. Gallagher by a court of competent jurisdiction, and attaching thereto the corresponding letters testamentary or letters of administration. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the granting of respondent's motion and dismissal of this case or other appropriate action by this Court.