From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gallacher v. Kisner

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Jul 15, 2009
Case No. 2:08 CV 845 TC (D. Utah Jul. 15, 2009)

Summary

dismissing plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 14141 because it does not provide for a private right of action

Summary of this case from Trosper v. State

Opinion

Case No. 2:08 CV 845 TC.

July 15, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The court referred this case to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On June 25, 2009, Judge Warner, in a very thorough Report and Recommendation, recommended that this case be DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. 1915 and that Plaintiff's motions for service of process and appointment of counsel be DENIED.

(Dkt. 8)

The parties were given ten days to file objections to the Report and Recommendation and were cautioned that failure to file an objection could constitute waiver thereof upon subsequent review. Plaintiff filed an objection on July 7, 3009. Plaintiff's objection does nothing to cure the infirmities of the complaint.

(Dkt. 9)

The court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation in this matter and relevant materials in the file and agrees with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the order of the court. Plaintiff's complaint is frivolous and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's motions for service of process and appointment of counsel are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gallacher v. Kisner

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Jul 15, 2009
Case No. 2:08 CV 845 TC (D. Utah Jul. 15, 2009)

dismissing plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 14141 because it does not provide for a private right of action

Summary of this case from Trosper v. State
Case details for

Gallacher v. Kisner

Case Details

Full title:JOHN GALLACHER, Plaintiff, v. SHARON KISNER and NOLAN OLSEN, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: Jul 15, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:08 CV 845 TC (D. Utah Jul. 15, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Williams

However, as argued by Defendant, Section 14141 does not provide a private right of action but instead…

Trosper v. State

42 U.S.C. § 14141 (authorizing Attorney General to investigate and, if warranted, file civil litigation to…