From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galindo v. Warden, FCI Texarkana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Nov 14, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-80 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 14, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-80

11-14-2013

GUADALUPE A. GALINDO v. WARDEN, FCI TEXARKANA


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, Guadalupe A. Galindo, a federal prisoner confined at FCI Texarkana, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Caroline Craven, United States Magistrate Judge, at Texarkana, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends the petition be dismissed.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.

_________________

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Galindo v. Warden, FCI Texarkana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Nov 14, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-80 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Galindo v. Warden, FCI Texarkana

Case Details

Full title:GUADALUPE A. GALINDO v. WARDEN, FCI TEXARKANA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 14, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-80 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 14, 2013)

Citing Cases

Harrison v. Mosley

Further, the court notes that several courts have explicitly found that Carachuri - Rosendo is not…

Davidson v. United States

Moreover, numerous federal courts have concluded that Carachuri is not retroactive. See Galindo v. Warden,…