Opinion
CV18-131-BLG-SPW
06-01-2021
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
SUSAN P. WATTERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations on Pantaenius and the Insurer Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment. (Docs. 51 and 52). The Magistrate recommended that the motions be granted. (Doc. 58 at 2).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), parties are required to file written objections within 14 days of the filing of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court reviews the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendation, this Court does not find that the Magistrate committed clear error.
IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered by the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 58) are ADOPTED IN FULL.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Insurer Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 51) and Pantaenius' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 52) be GRANTED.