From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galik v. Nangalama

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
No. 2: 09-cv-0152 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2: 09-cv-0152 WBS KJN P

10-18-2011

KEVIN GALIK, Plaintiff, v. A. NANGALAMA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On September 7, 2011, defendants tiled a request tor clarification ot the scheduling order. The scheduling order states that all pre-trial motions, except motions to compel, are due on or before September 30, 2011. Defendants state that they are unclear as to what the court meant by "pre-trial motions." Defendants state that "pre-trial" motions could conceivably refer to motions in limine.

Defendants are informed that the pre-trial motion deadline does not apply to motions customarily filed before trial, such as motions in limine.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' September 7, 2011 request for clarification is resolved.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Galik v. Nangalama

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
No. 2: 09-cv-0152 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Galik v. Nangalama

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN GALIK, Plaintiff, v. A. NANGALAMA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

No. 2: 09-cv-0152 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)