From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galik v. Nangalama

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2011
No. 2: 09-cv-0152 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2: 09-cv-0152 WBS KJN P.

October 19, 2011


ORDER


On September 7, 2011, defendants filed a request for clarification of the scheduling order. The scheduling order states that all pre-trial motions, except motions to compel, are due on or before September 30, 2011. Defendants state that they are unclear as to what the court meant by "pre-trial motions." Defendants state that "pre-trial" motions could conceivably refer to motions in limine.

Defendants are informed that the pre-trial motion deadline does not apply to motions customarily filed before trial, such as motions in limine.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' September 7, 2011 request for clarification is resolved.

DATED: October 18, 2011


Summaries of

Galik v. Nangalama

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2011
No. 2: 09-cv-0152 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Galik v. Nangalama

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN GALIK, Plaintiff, v. A. NANGALAMA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

No. 2: 09-cv-0152 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)