From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galerie Rienzo Ltd. v. Lobacz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 7, 2011
85 A.D.3d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

Nos. 5285, 5285A.

June 7, 2011.

Amended judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Donna Marie Mills, J.), entered April 28, 2010, upon a jury verdict in plaintiffs favor, directing defendant to surrender two paintings to plaintiff and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered March 19, 2010, which denied defendant's motion to set aside the verdict, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the amended judgment.

Barry V. Pittman, Bay Shore, for appellant.

Winston Winston P.C., New York (Arthur Winston of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Renwick and Román, JJ.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see generally McDermott v Coffee Beanery, Ltd., 9 AD3d 195, 206). There exists no basis to disturb the jury's credibility determinations ( see e.g. Bykowsky v Eskenazi, 72 AD3d 590, lv denied 16 NY3d 701).

[Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 30579(U).]


Summaries of

Galerie Rienzo Ltd. v. Lobacz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 7, 2011
85 A.D.3d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Galerie Rienzo Ltd. v. Lobacz

Case Details

Full title:GALERIE RIENZO LTD., Respondent, v. FRANK M. LOBACZ, M.D., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 7, 2011

Citations

85 A.D.3d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 4756
924 N.Y.S.2d 267