Opinion
3:10-CV-00468-LRH (WGC)
10-31-2011
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTES OF THE COURT
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK: JENNIFER COTTER REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Plaintiff has filed a motion to strike Defendants' answer because the allegations are "impertinent and scandalous" and "their only purpose is to create prejudice against Plaintiff. (Doc. # 55)
Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a) provides for the filing of a complaint and an answer and various other pleadings. Defendants filed their answer on December 1, 2010. (Doc. # 15.) The court has reviewed Defendants' answer, and finds nothing impertinent or scandalous. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion to strike (Doc. # 55) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
Deputy Clerk