From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gale v. Liffey Van Lines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 195 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 17, 2000

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered December 14, 1998, which denied an application to stay enforcement of a warehouseman's lien upon the movant's failure to appear in court on the return date of the application, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

Pro Se, for plaintiff-appellant.

Jonathan M. Ettman, for defendant-respondent.

ROSENBERGER, J.P., WILLIAM, RUBIN, SAXE, BUCKLEY, JJ.


No appeal lies from an order, such as this, entered on default of the aggrieved party (CPLR 5511 ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Gale v. Liffey Van Lines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 195 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Gale v. Liffey Van Lines

Case Details

Full title:SONNY GALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIFFEY VAN LINES, Defendant-Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 195 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 717

Citing Cases

Seinfeld v. Robinson

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Friedman and Sweeny, JJ. No appeal lies from an order, such as…