From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galdo v. PPL Elec. Utils. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 26, 2016
CIVIL ACTION No. 14-5831 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 26, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 14-5831

08-26-2016

JOHN GALDO, et al. v. PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION


JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this 26th day of August, 2016, following a bench trial on February 8, 2016-February 9, 2016, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED judgment is entered in the above-captioned case on all claims in favor of Defendant PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and against Plaintiffs William Clair, Jamie Connolly, John Doherty, Kevin Ehritz, Thomas Gurgick, Jr., George Knebel, Ricardo Maderas, Jr., Michael Murphy, Pamela Shinsky, Harold Spiess, Jr., Kenneth Steward, Gregory Tenley, and Stephaniejane Afalla (Villaneuva).

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

Juan R. Sánchez

Juan R. Sánchez, J.


Summaries of

Galdo v. PPL Elec. Utils. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 26, 2016
CIVIL ACTION No. 14-5831 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Galdo v. PPL Elec. Utils. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN GALDO, et al. v. PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 26, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 14-5831 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 26, 2016)