From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GALA v. BRITT

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 7, 2010
2:10-cv-79-RLH-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2010)

Opinion

2:10-cv-79-RLH-RJJ.

October 7, 2010


ORDER


This matter was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge on a Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (#38) file in pro per by Plaintiff Kanti Gala.

The Court having reviewed the motions makes the following findings:

1. The Motion (#38) was filed in pro per by Plaintiff Kanti Gala.
2. Plaintiff Kanti Gala is represented by James J. Pisanelli, Esq. of Pisanelli Bice PLLC. See, Order (#33).
3. Pursuant to Local Rule IA 10-6 "A party who has appeared by attorney cannot while so represented appear or act in the case. . . ."

Good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall strike the Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (#38) file in pro per by Plaintiff Kanti Gala.

DATED this 7th day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

GALA v. BRITT

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 7, 2010
2:10-cv-79-RLH-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2010)
Case details for

GALA v. BRITT

Case Details

Full title:KANTI GALA, etc., et al., Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM B. BRITT, etc., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 7, 2010

Citations

2:10-cv-79-RLH-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2010)