From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gajdos v. Missig

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 14, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-1362 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 14, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-1362.

January 14, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2008, after the plaintiff, Joseph Gajdos, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a motion for summary judgment was submitted by the defendants, Noel Missig, Frank Diener and the Borough of West Mifflin, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties thirteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by the plaintiff and the response to those objections filed by the defendants, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 20), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 14) is granted.


Summaries of

Gajdos v. Missig

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 14, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-1362 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 14, 2008)
Case details for

Gajdos v. Missig

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH GAJDOS, also known as JOSEPH RAYMOND GAJDOS, Plaintiff, v. NOEL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 14, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-1362 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 14, 2008)

Citing Cases

Square D Company v. Scott Electric Company

See W.D. Pa. L.R. 56.1(E); see also Gajdos v. Missig, Civil Action No. 06-1362, 2008 WL 147150, at *1 n. 1…

Hempfling v. United Refining Company of Pennsylvania

Accordingly, all said facts are deemed admitted by Defendant URC. See W.D. Pa. L.R. 56.1(E) ("Alleged…