From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gainey v. Woodall

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 28, 1968
207 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 1968)

Opinion

No. 36897.

February 28, 1968.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Herbert A. Langston, Jr., of Meyers, Mooney Langston, Orlando, for petitioner.

Brannon, Brown, Norris, Vocelle Haley, Lake City, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 26, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The motion of petitioner for attorney's fees in this Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C.J., and DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

ADAMS, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Gainey v. Woodall

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 28, 1968
207 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 1968)
Case details for

Gainey v. Woodall

Case Details

Full title:HAL J. GAINEY, PETITIONER, v. MORRIS WOODALL AND CORPORATE GROUP SERVICE…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 28, 1968

Citations

207 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 1968)