From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaines v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 28, 2012
2:11-cv-206-GMN-RJJ (D. Nev. Jun. 28, 2012)

Opinion

2:11-cv-206-GMN-RJJ

06-28-2012

RONALD KWAME GAINES, Plaintiff, v. GREG COX, et al., Defendant,


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration and Proposed Scheduling Order (#52).

The Court has reviewed the Motion (#52) and the Response (#58. The substantial involvement of the Plaintiff in litigating his case has convinced the Court that a timely resolution will be reached by a cooperative preparation of a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. This procedure is not often followed by the court, but in this case, it makes good sense. The conference regarding discovery can be conducted by the parties by telephone. Good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration and Proposed Scheduling Order (#52) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a join, proposed discovery plan and scheduling order on or before July 12, 2012.

_________________

ROBERT J. JOHNSTON

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Gaines v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 28, 2012
2:11-cv-206-GMN-RJJ (D. Nev. Jun. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Gaines v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:RONALD KWAME GAINES, Plaintiff, v. GREG COX, et al., Defendant,

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 28, 2012

Citations

2:11-cv-206-GMN-RJJ (D. Nev. Jun. 28, 2012)