From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaines v. Bennett

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Jun 4, 2015
2:13-cv-02070 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2015)

Opinion


JAMES CALVIN GAINES, Plaintiff, v. C/O BENNETT, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-02070 AC P United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division. June 4, 2015

          [PROPOSED] ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the unopposed request of Defendants Neimann and Bennett, ECF No. 24, to amend their answer to the complaint is HEREBY GRANTED. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1). Within seven days after the filing date of this order, defendants shall separately file and serve their Amended Answer (currently set forth in proposed form at ECF No. 24 at 6-12).

         SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gaines v. Bennett

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Jun 4, 2015
2:13-cv-02070 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Gaines v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CALVIN GAINES, Plaintiff, v. C/O BENNETT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Jun 4, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-02070 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2015)