Summary
In Gaines v. Holmes, 154 Ga. 344, 114 S.E. 327, 27 A.L.R. 98, the Supreme Court of Georgia quoted this language: "'If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety... Is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of the Courts to so adjudge, and thereby give effect to the Constitution'".
Summary of this case from Garrett v. Faubus, GovernorOpinion
05-21-01001-CR
01-04-2022
MARKELL DEVORK GAINES-HOLMES, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Do Not Publish Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b)
On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-83916-2021
Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Garcia
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
After Markell Devork Gaines-Holmes pleaded guilty to assault involving family violence, the trial court found him guilty and assessed punishment at ten years in prison, probated for five years. Appellant then filed a notice of appeal. The district clerk forwarded the notice, along with a copy of appellant's plea bargain agreement, the rule 25.2 certification of appellant's right to appeal, and a copy of the judgment. After reviewing those documents, we asked the parties for letter briefs addressing how the Court had jurisdiction. On December 1, 2021, appointed counsel Jennifer Castleman filed a motion to withdraw, stating that when she contacted appellant about our letter, he told her he wanted her to withdraw from the case and ordered her not to file any documents on his behalf. To date, the State has not responded.
Rule 25.2 governs the perfection of appeals in criminal cases and requires that the trial court certify an appellant's right to appeal. Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2 also requires the recitations in a certification to be true and supported by the record. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (certification not supported by record is defective); Carender v. State, 155 S.W.3d 929, 930-31 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2005, no pet.).
Here, appellant signed a written plea bargain agreement in which the State agreed to ten years of confinement, probated for five years in exchange for, among other things, appellant pleading guilty and waiving his right to appeal. The plea bargain agreement is signed by appellant, his appointed counsel, the representative for the State, and the trial court. No pretrial motions were filed. The judgment states this is a plea bargain agreement and under "special findings or orders" notes: "APPEAL WAIVED. NO PERMISSION TO APPEAL GRANTED." The trial court certified (1) this is a plea-bargain case and appellant has no right to appeal and (2) appellant waived his right to appeal. Both appellant and his trial counsel signed the certification. Because appellant waived his right to appeal, we have no other alternative than to dismiss this appeal.
We dismiss this appeal.
JUDGMENT
Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.