Summary
upholding regulation of liquor prices
Summary of this case from New Jersey Ass'n of Ticket Brokers v. TicketronOpinion
Submitted May 26, 1939 —
Decided October 16, 1939.
On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 122 N.J.L. 39.
For the prosecutor-appellant, Quinn Doremus ( John J. Quinn) and William F. Hanlon.
For the defendant-respondent, Nathan L. Jacobs.
We consider that it was within the authority of the State Commissioner of Alcoholic Beverage Control to impose the regulation under review and to suspend the license of a violating licensee. Having in mind that this is the extent of the holding we affirm for the reasons stated by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 11.
For reversal — PERSKIE, J. 1.