From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaik v. Barr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 30, 2020
No. 5:19-CV-02214-PSG (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2020)

Opinion

No. 5:19-CV-02214-PSG (JDE)

04-30-2020

MKITARYAN GAIK, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, et al., Respondents.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition (Dkt. 6, "Petition"), the Return to Petition (Dkt. 10), and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 12). No party filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation or sought additional time in which to do so. The Court accordingly accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. Dated: 4/30/2020

/s/_________

PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gaik v. Barr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 30, 2020
No. 5:19-CV-02214-PSG (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Gaik v. Barr

Case Details

Full title:MKITARYAN GAIK, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 30, 2020

Citations

No. 5:19-CV-02214-PSG (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2020)