Opinion
2:22-cv-01046-CDS-NJK
02-15-2023
Adam Allen David Liebrader, Esq. State Bar No. 5048 Adam Allen, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff GIBBS GIDEN LOCHER TURNER SENET & WITTBRODT Giorgio Sassine Richard E. Haskin, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 11592 Steven Mack, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 4000 Nathan D. O'Malley, Esq. CA Bar No. 212193 (Pro Hac Vice) Peter J. Diedrich, Esq. CA Bar No. 101649 (Pro Hac Vice) Giorgio A. Sassine, Esq. CA Bar No. 324639 (Pro Hac Vice) MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP Attorney for Specially Appearing Payvision, B.V.
Adam Allen
David Liebrader, Esq.
State Bar No. 5048
Adam Allen, Esq.
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GIBBS GIDEN LOCHER TURNER SENET & WITTBRODT
Giorgio Sassine
Richard E. Haskin, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 11592
Steven Mack, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 4000
Nathan D. O'Malley, Esq.
CA Bar No. 212193 (Pro Hac Vice)
Peter J. Diedrich, Esq.
CA Bar No. 101649 (Pro Hac Vice)
Giorgio A. Sassine, Esq.
CA Bar No. 324639 (Pro Hac Vice)
MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP
Attorney for Specially Appearing Payvision, B.V.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT PAYVISION, B.V. WITH PREJUDICE
THE HONORABLE CRISTINA D. SILVA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
Plaintiff Gaia Ethnobotanical, LLC d/b/a Mitragaia, through its counsel of record, David Liebrader, Esq. of The Law Office of David Liebrader, and Adam Allen, Esq. of Allen & Associates, and Defendants Payvision, B.V., as well as Payvision U.S. Inc., Joe Emig and Scott Bodily, by and through their counsel of record, the law firms of Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt and Musick, Peeler & Garrett LLP, and stipulate and agree as follows.
It Is Hereby Stipulated that all claims stated in the pending action against Defendant Payvision, B.V., be dismissed with prejudice, in their entirety, these settling parties to bear their own fees and costs. This dismissal shall not apply to the other named defendants in this action. Plaintiff's motion to add Payvision US, Inc., Scott Bodily and Joe Emig to this action is withdrawn with prejudice.
It Is Further Stipulated this stipulation does not affect remaining claims against any other named Defendants and all other pending hearings shall remain unaffected by this Stipulation.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Based on the foregoing, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims stated in the pending action against defendant Payvision, B.V. are dismissed, with prejudice, in their entirety, these settling parties to bear their own fees and costs.
Because the joint stipulation to dismiss claims against Payvision, B.V. was refiled rather than filed as a corrected image, ECF No. 55 is DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Payvision, B.V.'s motion to dismiss [ECF No. 19] is DENIED as moot.