From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gagnon v. Seirup

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 18, 2016
Docket No. 1:16-cv-024-NT (D. Me. Oct. 18, 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 1:16-cv-024-NT

10-18-2016

JOHN LUC GAGNON, Plaintiff, v. AMANDA SEIRUP, Defendant.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On September 19, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Nancy Torresen

United States Chief District Judge Dated this 18th day of October, 2016.


Summaries of

Gagnon v. Seirup

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 18, 2016
Docket No. 1:16-cv-024-NT (D. Me. Oct. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Gagnon v. Seirup

Case Details

Full title:JOHN LUC GAGNON, Plaintiff, v. AMANDA SEIRUP, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Oct 18, 2016

Citations

Docket No. 1:16-cv-024-NT (D. Me. Oct. 18, 2016)