From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gagnon v. Seirup

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jun 15, 2016
Docket No. 1:16-CV-024-NT (D. Me. Jun. 15, 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 1:16-CV-024-NT

06-15-2016

LUC JOHN GAGNON, Plaintiff, v. AMANDA SEIRUP, Ph.D. and BERT RAND GOSSELIN Defendants.


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 27, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on the Defendant Amanda Seirup's Motion to Dismiss. The Defendant Seirup filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on June 13, 2016. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Defendant Seirup's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and the Plaintiff's state law medical malpractice claims are DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

Dated this 15th day of June, 2016.

/s/ Nancy Torresen

United States Chief District Judge


Summaries of

Gagnon v. Seirup

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jun 15, 2016
Docket No. 1:16-CV-024-NT (D. Me. Jun. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Gagnon v. Seirup

Case Details

Full title:LUC JOHN GAGNON, Plaintiff, v. AMANDA SEIRUP, Ph.D. and BERT RAND GOSSELIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jun 15, 2016

Citations

Docket No. 1:16-CV-024-NT (D. Me. Jun. 15, 2016)

Citing Cases

Poole v. Hancock Cnty.

In circumstances in which a plaintiff has failed to show through filings that they have complied with, or…