From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gage v. City of Portland

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 22, 1994
125 Or. App. 119 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

93-030; CA A80355

On petitioner's petition for reconsideration filed October 27, reconsideration allowed, opinion ( 123 Or. App. 269, 860 P.2d 282) adhered to December 8, 1993, reconsideration denied February 9, petition for review allowed March 22, 1994 ( 318 Or. 478) See later issue Oregon Reports

Judicial Review from Land Use Board of Appeals.

Edward J. Sullivan and Preston Thorgrimson Shidler Gates Ellis for petition.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Durham, Judges.


DEITS, P.J.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion adhered to.


Petitioners seek Supreme Court review of our opinion. Treating the petition as one for reconsideration by this court, we allow it. For the reasons stated in our opinion on reconsideration in Friends of the Metolius v. Jefferson County, 125 Or. App. 122, 866 P.2d 463 (1993), we adhere to our opinion.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion adhered to.


Summaries of

Gage v. City of Portland

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 22, 1994
125 Or. App. 119 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Gage v. City of Portland

Case Details

Full title:Dorothy GAGE and Ashcreek Neighborhood Association, Petitioners, v. CITY…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 22, 1994

Citations

125 Or. App. 119 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
866 P.2d 466

Citing Cases

State v. Eberhardt

Durham, 49 Ohio App.2d at 239-40. 5th Dist. Muskingum No. 93-30, 1994 WL 171808(Mar. 22, 1994). {¶27} In the…