From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaffney v. Gough

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1868
36 Cal. 104 (Cal. 1868)

Summary

In Gaffney v. Gough, 36 Cal. 104, an undivided half of the contract had been assigned by the contractor, and the demand was made by the contractor alone.

Summary of this case from Foley v. Bullard

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco.

         The defendants demurred to the complaint. The Court overruled the demurrer, and the defendants declining to answer, judgment by default passed against them. From this judgment the defendants appealed.

         COUNSEL:

         T. I. Bergin, for Appellants.

          O. L. Lane, for Respondents.


         JUDGES: Sawyer, C. J. Mr. Justice Sanderson expressed no opinion.

         OPINION

          SAWYER, Judge

         This is a suit for a street assessment in San Francisco Gaffney was the contractor. He assigned one undivided half interest in the contract to the defendant, Donohue. After the assessment was made, and the warrant issued, Gaffney, the contractor, who still owned one undivided half of the amount due, made a personal demand upon defendants, in all respects as required by statute, if he was competent to make the demand. It is claimed, however, that he could not make a legal demand so as to charge defendants, because he only owned one half, and does not appear to have been the agent to collect the other half, or authorized to receipt for it. The statute says the contractor, or his agent, or assigns, shall call upon the persons so assessed, and demand payment of the amount assessed to each. One of the persons designated did make the demand, and this, we think, is sufficient to establish the liability and charge the land with the lien. The complaint is, therefore, sufficient in this respect.

         The only other point made, is, that a personal judgment was rendered against the defendants. In this respect there is error under the rule adopted in the cases of Taylor v. Palmer, 31 Cal. 241, and Coniff v. Hastings, decided at the present term. And upon the authority of those cases the judgment must be modified by omitting the personal judgment against defendant, and limiting the relief granted to a sale of the lot upon which the assessment is made.

         Ordered accordingly, and remittitur directed to issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Gaffney v. Gough

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1868
36 Cal. 104 (Cal. 1868)

In Gaffney v. Gough, 36 Cal. 104, an undivided half of the contract had been assigned by the contractor, and the demand was made by the contractor alone.

Summary of this case from Foley v. Bullard
Case details for

Gaffney v. Gough

Case Details

Full title:JAMES GAFFNEY and THOMAS DONOHUE v. H. O. GOUGH and H. A. COBB

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1868

Citations

36 Cal. 104 (Cal. 1868)

Citing Cases

Raleigh v. Peace

The foregoing reasons are entirely conclusive to our minds, and are well sustained by authority. Higgins v.…

Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Reclamation District No. 404

The decision was adhered to in a number of cases immediately following it, and it has become a…