From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaede v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Apr 14, 2022
2022 N.D. 71 (N.D. 2022)

Opinion

20210336

04-14-2022

Dennis James Gaede, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief. Birch P. Burdick, State's Attorney, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.


Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Birch P. Burdick, State's Attorney, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Dennis James Gaede appeals from an order denying his petition for postconviction relief. Gaede claims his 2018 diagnosis for post-traumatic stress disorder ("PTSD") is newly discovered evidence. The district court found Gaede's PTSD diagnosis is not newly discovered evidence, and this claim was brought outside the statute of limitations provided in N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-01(3)(b). We conclude the court did not clearly err in finding Gaede's claim is outside the statute of limitations in denying Gaede's petition for postconviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W.VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte


Summaries of

Gaede v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Apr 14, 2022
2022 N.D. 71 (N.D. 2022)
Case details for

Gaede v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dennis James Gaede, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Apr 14, 2022

Citations

2022 N.D. 71 (N.D. 2022)

Citing Cases

Gaede v. State

We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). See also Gaede v. State, 2022 ND 71, ¶ 1, 973 N.W.2d 5…