From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gadsden v. Carpenter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 14, 2013
3:12-CV-0098-RCJ (VPC) (D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2013)

Opinion

3:12-CV-0098-RCJ (VPC)

01-14-2013

CHIOKE GADSDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. T. CARPENTER, et al., Defendants.

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Before the court is plaintiffs' motion to compel or extend discovery (#22). Defendants opposed the motion (#24), and plaintiffs replied (#27). The court acknowledges that the plaintiffs' discovery requests were nearly two weeks tardy. However, the plaintiffs are appearing in pro se and in light of the defendants' request for an extension of time to file dispositive motions, there is no prejudice in granting the motion. Therefore, plaintiffs' motion to compel (#22) is GRANTED. Defendants shall provide responses to plaintiffs' discovery requests served on November 1, 2012 on or before Monday, February 4, 2013.

Defendants' motion for an extension of time to file dispositive motions is GRANTED. The parties shall have to and including Thursday, February 14, 2013 to file a dispositive motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: ______________________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Gadsden v. Carpenter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 14, 2013
3:12-CV-0098-RCJ (VPC) (D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Gadsden v. Carpenter

Case Details

Full title:CHIOKE GADSDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. T. CARPENTER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 14, 2013

Citations

3:12-CV-0098-RCJ (VPC) (D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2013)