Gadre v. Hexanika, Inc.

Full title: MAKARAND GADRE, Plaintiff, v. HEXANIKA, INC., Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 12, 2022

21-CV-11221 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-11221 (JPO)

10-12-2022

MAKARAND GADRE, Plaintiff, v. HEXANIKA, INC., Defendant.

J. PAUL OETKEN, DISTRICT JUDGE.

ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff Makarand Gadre filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant Hexanika, Inc. on August 18, 2022. (Dkt. No. 23). Plaintiff filed a certificate of service indicating that the motion for default judgment was served on the Defendant on September 23, 2022. (Dkt. No. 26-3). If Defendant wishes to respond, it must retain counsel and file a response by October 28, 2022 .

Defendant should note that a corporate entity may not appear pro-se-in other words, Hexanika, Inc. must retain legal counsel to contest this lawsuit .

If Defendant does not file a response through its counsel by October 28, 2022, default judgment may be granted in favor of Plaintiff.

Plaintiff is directed to provide a copy of this order to Defendant by email.

SO ORDERED.