From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaddy v. Harrell

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jun 29, 2010
1:08CV97 (M.D.N.C. Jun. 29, 2010)

Opinion

1:08CV97.

June 29, 2010


ORDER


The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on May 18, 2010, was served on the parties in this action. Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss [Docket No. 18] is GRANTED and that this action is dismissed. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Gaddy v. Harrell

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jun 29, 2010
1:08CV97 (M.D.N.C. Jun. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Gaddy v. Harrell

Case Details

Full title:TITUS ALPHONSO GADDY, Plaintiff, v. DR. C.A. HARRELL and NICOLE COZAIRER…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Jun 29, 2010

Citations

1:08CV97 (M.D.N.C. Jun. 29, 2010)

Citing Cases

Gaddy v. Harrell

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by…