From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gable v. Meeks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 8, 2019
Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-1545-M (N.D. Tex. Jul. 8, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-1545-M

07-08-2019

DAN GABLE, Plaintiff, v. RANDY MEEKS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed September 18, 2018 (doc. 18) is GRANTED. By separate judgment, all of the plaintiff's claims against the named defendants will be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and the plaintiff's remaining claims against the unnamed defendants will be sua sponte DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

SIGNED this 8th day of July, 2019.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Gable v. Meeks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 8, 2019
Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-1545-M (N.D. Tex. Jul. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Gable v. Meeks

Case Details

Full title:DAN GABLE, Plaintiff, v. RANDY MEEKS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 8, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-1545-M (N.D. Tex. Jul. 8, 2019)

Citing Cases

Fields v. City of Sherman

Moreover, "[b]ecause [Plaintiff] is proceeding pro se . . . he may not recover attorney's fees." Gable v.…