From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

G. M. J. W. Magill v. Goshorn

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Feb 5, 1913
153 S.W. 185 (Tex. Civ. App. 1913)

Opinion

January 8, 1913. Rehearing Denied February 5, 1913.

Appeal from District Court, Matagorda County; Wells Thompson, Judge.

Action by Mary Goshorn against G. M. and J. W. Magill. From judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

Gaines Corbett, of Bay City, for appellants. Linn, Conger Austin, of Bay City, for appellee.


This case is identical in all things, except parties plaintiff and amount involved, with the case of G. M. J. W. Magill v. Sadie A. Young, 153 S.W. 184, decided to-day by this court, and for the reasons assigned in that case this cause will be affirmed. The appellant has filed a motion suggesting delay and asking for 10 per cent. damages. The motion is granted. There was no merit in the defense, and it seems clear to us that this appeal is taken merely for delay. The judgment of the court is affirmed, with 10 per cent. damages.


Summaries of

G. M. J. W. Magill v. Goshorn

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Feb 5, 1913
153 S.W. 185 (Tex. Civ. App. 1913)
Case details for

G. M. J. W. Magill v. Goshorn

Case Details

Full title:G. M. J. W. MAGILL v. GOSHORN

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio

Date published: Feb 5, 1913

Citations

153 S.W. 185 (Tex. Civ. App. 1913)

Citing Cases

Brady Mut. Life Ins. Ass'n v. Shank

) 136 S.W. 499; G., H. S. A. R. Co. v. Supply Co. (Tex.Civ.App.) 136 S.W. 833; Magill v. Goshorn…