From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Reto

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 24, 2022
No. 21-56055 (9th Cir. Aug. 24, 2022)

Opinion

21-56055

08-24-2022

G AND G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL RETO, DBA The Lab, individually, Defendant-Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Submitted May 10, 2022 Pasadena, California

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California William D. Keller, District Judge, Presiding D.C. No. 2:19-cv-07915-WDK-JC

Before: McKEOWN and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and DANIELS, District Judge.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM

G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC, appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment on its 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605 claims and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over its state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

This is one of three appeals brought by G and G that implicate the application of 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605 to commercial programs that are broadcast over the internet. All three appeals raise identical issues, the substance of which we addressed in our opinion in G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Liu, No. 21-56047, __ F.4th __(9th Cir. 2022). For the reasons explained in our opinion, we affirm the district court's order.

In this case, as in Liu, the district court granted G and G ample opportunity to conduct discovery on the method by which the commercial program was broadcast. And here, as in Liu, G and G declined to take advantage of this opportunity and instead relied on conclusory statements regarding the method of transmission. It was G and G's burden at summary judgment to come forward with evidence establishing a genuine dispute of material fact. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986). Because G and G failed to carry this burden, summary judgment was appropriate.

AFFIRMED.

The Honorable George B. Daniels, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.


Summaries of

G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Reto

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 24, 2022
No. 21-56055 (9th Cir. Aug. 24, 2022)
Case details for

G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Reto

Case Details

Full title:G AND G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL RETO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 24, 2022

Citations

No. 21-56055 (9th Cir. Aug. 24, 2022)

Citing Cases

G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Palomarez

Here, as in Liu, Plaintiff has failed to present evidence establishing that Defendants' transmission of the…