Futurelogic, Inc. v. Nanoptix, Inc.

Full title: FUTURELOGIC, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NANOPTIX, INC., Defendant-Cross…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 10, 2012

484 F. App'x 564 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2012-1095 2012-1136

10-10-2012

FUTURELOGIC, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NANOPTIX, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant.

BRETT J. WILLIAMSON, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, of Newport Beach, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. ADAM K. YOWELL and MICHAEL D. ROUNDS, Watson Rounds, of Reno, Nevada, argued for the defendant-cross appellant.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 10-CV-7678, Judge John F. Walter.

JUDGMENT

BRETT J. WILLIAMSON, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, of Newport Beach, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

ADAM K. YOWELL and MICHAEL D. ROUNDS, Watson Rounds, of Reno, Nevada, argued for the defendant-cross appellant. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LINN and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_______

Jan Horbaly

Clerk