From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Futherer v. Angelidis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 8, 1941
261 App. Div. 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

January 8, 1941.

Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the twenty-year, and not the six-year, Statute of Limitations applies to the cause of action set forth in the complaint. (See Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 47, 48; Atlantic Dock Co. v. Leavitt, 54 N.Y. 35; Bowen v. Beck, 94 id. 86; Hyde v. Miller, 45 App. Div. 396; Quackenbush v. Mapes, No. 1, 123 id. 242; Hulbert v. Clark, 57 Hun, 558; affd., 128 N.Y. 295; Greenly v. Greenly, 114 App. Div. 640; Anguish v. Blair, 160 id. 52; affd., 216 N.Y. 746.) All concur. (The order denies defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint in an action to recover installments of interest on a bond secured by a second mortgage.)


Summaries of

Futherer v. Angelidis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 8, 1941
261 App. Div. 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Futherer v. Angelidis

Case Details

Full title:EMMA E. FUTHERER and Others, Respondents, v. DAVID C. ANGELIDIS, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 8, 1941

Citations

261 App. Div. 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Citing Cases

Ernst v. Schaack

The last payment by defendants on account of interest was made on August 12, 1936, but inasmuch as the…