From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Futch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 28, 1988
531 So. 2d 422 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-3599.

September 28, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Polk County, Joe R. Young, Jr., J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Candance M. Sutherland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs and a fee for the services of the public defender without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Barron v. State, 524 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgment and sentence are affirmed in all other respects.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Futch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 28, 1988
531 So. 2d 422 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Futch v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLIFFORD MAURICE FUTCH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 28, 1988

Citations

531 So. 2d 422 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)