From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Futch v. Fine

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Feb 12, 2009
Civil Action No. 09 0420 (D.D.C. Feb. 12, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09 0420.

February 12, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's pro se complaint and his application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the complaint.

Plaintiff, a federal prisoner currently confined to a segregated housing unit for his own protection, has filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for injunctive relief, alleging that his due process rights have been violated because the defendant, the Inspector General for the United States Department of Justice, has not conducted an investigation that plaintiff requested. There is, however, no such thing as a due process right to an investigation by the Department of Justice's Inspector General, and plaintiff has not identified any other way in which his due process rights might have been violated. Therefore, plaintiff has not stated a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 upon which relief may be granted. Federal law obligates this Court to dismiss this complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (requiring a court to dismiss a complaint if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted). A final order accompanies this memorandum opinion.


Summaries of

Futch v. Fine

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Feb 12, 2009
Civil Action No. 09 0420 (D.D.C. Feb. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Futch v. Fine

Case Details

Full title:John Randall Futch, Plaintiff, v. Glenn Fine, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Feb 12, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09 0420 (D.D.C. Feb. 12, 2009)