From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fussell v. Wilkinson

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 21, 2009
Case No. 1:03-cv-704 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 1:03-cv-704.

September 21, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed August 26, 2009 (Doc. 207).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Class member William E. Martin's motion for relief from judgment (Doc. 205) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Fussell v. Wilkinson

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 21, 2009
Case No. 1:03-cv-704 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2009)
Case details for

Fussell v. Wilkinson

Case Details

Full title:Rodney Fussell, et al., Plaintiffs v. Reginald Wilkinson, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Sep 21, 2009

Citations

Case No. 1:03-cv-704 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2009)

Citing Cases

Stewart v. Martin

“A void judgment under Rule 60(b)(4) occurs ‘[o]nly in the rare instance of a clear usurpation of power' by…