From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Furst v. Furst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1982
88 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

June 14, 1982


In a matrimonial action, plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), entered April 23, 1981, which denied his motion for downward modification of alimony payments and directed him to pay the sum of $2,500 to defendant wife as counsel fees. Order modified, on the law, by deleting the second decretal paragraph thereof. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The award of counsel fees to defendant was improper. She failed to demonstrate an inability to pay such fees (see Standley v. Standley, 83 A.D.2d 863; Palmer v. Palmer, 76 A.D.2d 905). Gibbons, J.P., Weinstein, O'Connor and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Furst v. Furst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1982
88 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Furst v. Furst

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE FURST, Appellant, v. MILDRED FURST, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1982

Citations

88 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Rough v. Kandell

Lastly, we find that on the record before us, Special Term's denial of the plaintiff's request for counsel…

Matter of Landrigan v. Landrigan

The appellant's application for counsel fees contained only conclusory hearsay allegations by her attorney in…