From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Furr v. Horry Cnty. Zoning Bd. of Appeals

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Mar 2, 2016
783 S.E.2d 51 (S.C. 2016)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2015–000271. No. 27608.

03-02-2016

Fayrell FURR and Karole Jensen, Petitioners, v. HORRY COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, Respondent.

Gene McCain Connell, Jr., of Kelaher Connell & Connor, P.C., of Surfside Beach, for petitioners. Leah Montgomery Cromer and Emma Ruth Brittain, both of Thomas & Brittain, P.A., of Myrtle Beach, for respondent.


Gene McCain Connell, Jr., of Kelaher Connell & Connor, P.C., of Surfside Beach, for petitioners.

Leah Montgomery Cromer and Emma Ruth Brittain, both of Thomas & Brittain, P.A., of Myrtle Beach, for respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM. We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' opinion in Furr v. Horry Cnty. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 411 S.C. 178, 767 S.E.2d 221 (Ct.App.2014). We now dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.


Summaries of

Furr v. Horry Cnty. Zoning Bd. of Appeals

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Mar 2, 2016
783 S.E.2d 51 (S.C. 2016)
Case details for

Furr v. Horry Cnty. Zoning Bd. of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:Fayrell FURR and Karole Jensen, Petitioners, v. HORRY COUNTY ZONING BOARD…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Date published: Mar 2, 2016

Citations

783 S.E.2d 51 (S.C. 2016)
783 S.E.2d 51