From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Furnare v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 15, 2017
No. 71629 (Nev. App. Aug. 15, 2017)

Opinion

No. 71629

08-15-2017

JODY ALEXANDER FURNARE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Jody Alexander Furnare appeals from an order of the district court denying a motion to correct an illegal sentence. Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Michael Montero, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument. NRAP 34(f)(3). --------

Furnare argues the district court erred in denying his March 17, 2016, motion to correct an illegal sentence. In his motion, Furnare claimed he suffered from a fundamental miscarriage of justice because he is actually innocent and his trial counsel was ineffective. Furnare's claims fell outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to correct an illegal sentence. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). To the extent Furnare also requested a modification of his sentence, his claims were not within the scope of a motion to modify sentence. See id. Therefore, without considering the merits of any of the claims raised in the motion, we conclude the district court did not err in denying the motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge

Jody Alexander Furnare

Attorney General/Carson City

Humboldt County District Attorney

Humboldt County Clerk


Summaries of

Furnare v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 15, 2017
No. 71629 (Nev. App. Aug. 15, 2017)
Case details for

Furnare v. State

Case Details

Full title:JODY ALEXANDER FURNARE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 15, 2017

Citations

No. 71629 (Nev. App. Aug. 15, 2017)