From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Furia v. Helm

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Three.
Sep 10, 2003
A100102 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 10, 2003)

Opinion

A100102.

9-10-2003

DAVID FURIA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HUGH N. HELM III, Defendant and Respondent.

John Jack Mavredakis, Counsel for plaintiff and appellant. Victor C. Thuesen, Counsel for defendant and respondent.


ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING CERTIFYING OPINION FOR PUBLICATION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

BY THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 29, 2003, be modified in the following particular:

On page 15, line 2, the word "improperly" is changed to "allegedly" so the sentence reads:

Although Helm allegedly concealed from Furia the fact that he did not intend to be neutral when attempting to mediate the dispute, Furia may not now reverse himself and claim that at Helms suggestion he withdrew from the remodeling project, and he has alleged no other causal link for his asserted damages.

There is no change in the judgment.

The request to withdraw certification for publication is denied.


Summaries of

Furia v. Helm

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Three.
Sep 10, 2003
A100102 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 10, 2003)
Case details for

Furia v. Helm

Case Details

Full title:DAVID FURIA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HUGH N. HELM III, Defendant and…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Three.

Date published: Sep 10, 2003

Citations

A100102 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 10, 2003)