From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Furey v. Wolfe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 17, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1820 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 17, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1820

08-17-2011

KEVIN FUREY v. POLICE OFFICER TRAVIS WOLFE, et al.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of August 2011, after consideration of Defendants' motion for leave to file a motion for summary judgment (Doc. 99), Plaintiff's response thereto (Doc. 99), Defendants' reply (Doc. 100), and Plaintiff's sur-reply (Doc. 101), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall have fourteen days from the date of this order, or until August 31, 2011, to file their motion for summary judgment, and Plaintiff shall have twenty-one days thereafter to respond.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for additional discovery is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renew the request when responding to Defendants' motion for summary judgment.

The Court's Order staying discovery remains in effect pending the Court's ruling on Plaintiff's affidavit in support of additional discovery.

BY THE COURT:

ELIZABETH T. HEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Furey v. Wolfe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 17, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1820 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Furey v. Wolfe

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN FUREY v. POLICE OFFICER TRAVIS WOLFE, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 17, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1820 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 17, 2011)