From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fura v. Fed. Express Corp. Long Term Disability Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 20, 2012
Case No. 10-13298 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 10-13298

09-20-2012

EDWARD FURA, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, et al., Defendants.


Hon. John Corbett O'Meara


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION

Defendants seek a stay of execution of the judgment and a waiver of the supersedeas bond requirement. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d). Under Rule 62(d), Defendants are entitled to an automatic stay of execution pending appeal, provided they post a supersedeas bond. The court may waive the bond requirement when "the defendant's ability to pay the judgment is so plain that the cost of the bond would be a waste of money." Arban v. West Pub. Corp., 345 F.3d 390, 409 (6th Cir. 2003). Here, Plaintiff has not filed a response and does not dispute that Defendants clearly have the ability to pay the judgment.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion for stay and waiver of the bond requirement is GRANTED.

John Corbett O'Meara

United States District Judge

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on this date, September 20, 2012, using the ECF system.

William Barkholz

Case Manager


Summaries of

Fura v. Fed. Express Corp. Long Term Disability Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 20, 2012
Case No. 10-13298 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Fura v. Fed. Express Corp. Long Term Disability Plan

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD FURA, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION LONG TERM…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 20, 2012

Citations

Case No. 10-13298 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 20, 2012)