From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Funderburk v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 3, 1999
981 P.2d 301 (Okla. 1999)

Opinion

No. 92,389.

May 3, 1999.


ORDER

¶ 1 Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let the writ issue directing the respondent-judge, or any other judge assigned or to be assigned to Funderburk v. Utica Part Clinic, Cause No. CJ-97-1827, on the docket of the District Court, Tulsa County, forthwith to order that Hillcrest Medical Center deliver for the respondent's in camera inspection all the insurance and malpractice claims' information which has been withheld from production. Upon inspection, the respondent-judge shall allow discovery of those materials that pertain to credentialing and peer review activities affecting Dr. Tillum. Materials tending to show facts that were known and knowable about Dr. Tillum's level of skills are discoverable. 12 O.S. § 3226[ 12-3226], Wisdom v. McCall, 1998 OK 31, 956 P.2d 155, Strubhart Trust v. Perry Memorial Hospital, 1995 OK 10, 903 P.2d 263, Tuller v. Shallcross, 1994 OK 133, 886 P.2d 481; see in this connection Buzzard v. McDanel, 1987 OK 28, 736 P.2d 157, 160-161.

¶ 2 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 3rd DAY OF MAY, 1999.

¶ 3 ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.


Summaries of

Funderburk v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 3, 1999
981 P.2d 301 (Okla. 1999)
Case details for

Funderburk v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:Cassandra FUNDERBURK and Carl Funderburk, Petitioners, v. The Honorable…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: May 3, 1999

Citations

981 P.2d 301 (Okla. 1999)
1999 OK 37